Governance Recursion

trigger

"The core product had no tests, but there were 189 session decisions and 13 agent files."

what it is

When something goes wrong, the model's instinct is to generate more governance: a new standing order, a new protocol, a new audit document. Each one feels like progress because it's structured and coherent. But it's the model doing what it's optimised for (generating structured text) instead of what would actually help (writing a test, fixing the bug). There's no natural stopping point because each layer of governance can always spawn another.

what it signals

instead

Every governance artifact should be able to answer: "What does this prevent, and how would I know if it failed?" If the answer points to another governance artifact, you're recursing.

refs

• SD-189, SD-190, SD-191 (the recursion chain)
• SD-190: Captain, 'we are blowing smoke up our own arse'
• SD-270: Captain kills SO-PERM-001, caught nothing, added friction