$ cd ../journal
[Engineering][Dev Journal]

Dev Journal: Nov 4, 2025

>Richard Hallett#Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Completed three major phases of a notebook execution system, building from variable management and templating through LLM client abstraction to full end-to-end execution with result injection. The work demonstrates systematic architecture with strong emphasis on security, testing, and multi-provi...

Development Journal - 2025-11-04

Overview

Completed three major phases of a notebook execution system, building from variable management and templating through LLM client abstraction to full end-to-end execution with result injection. The work demonstrates systematic architecture with strong emphasis on security, testing, and multi-provider compatibility.

Active Projects: 1 Total Commits: 3


Projects

tome

Commits: 3 | Files Changed: 32

Completed three major phases of a notebook execution system, building from variable management and templating through LLM client abstraction to full end-to-end execution with result injection. The work demonstrates systematic architecture with strong emphasis on security, testing, and multi-provider compatibility.

Highlights

  • Completed Phase 2: Implemented comprehensive variable system with YAML parsing, Jinja2 templating, and security sandboxing (98% test coverage)

  • Completed Phase 3: Built unified LLM client abstraction supporting multiple backends (llm CLI, OpenAI, Anthropic) with cost tracking, retry logic, and comprehensive error handling

  • Completed Phase 4: Delivered end-to-end notebook execution system that parses .pnb.md files, resolves variables/prompts, executes via LLM, and injects results back into markdown

  • Achieved 178 total passing tests across all phases with robust test coverage (>90% on core modules)

  • Built complete CLI interface with colored output, execution summaries, and flexible configuration options

Technical Decisions

  • Used Jinja2 SandboxedEnvironment and yaml.safe_load() for security to prevent code injection vulnerabilities

  • Implemented unified backend abstraction pattern allowing seamless switching between LLM providers

  • Chose exponential backoff retry strategy (1s, 2s, 4s, 8s) for handling rate limits across different APIs

  • Designed idempotent execution system using HTML comments for result injection to allow re-running notebooks

  • Maintained Python 3.9+ compatibility by using Optional, Dict, List instead of newer union syntax

Learning Moments

  • Implemented comprehensive cost tracking with per-model pricing across different LLM providers

  • Explored advanced Jinja2 features including filters, loops, and conditionals for template rendering

  • Developed sophisticated error recovery patterns with continue/stop modes for robust notebook execution

  • Created mock-based testing strategy that achieves high coverage without requiring API keys


Originally generated by gitmaxxing

$ git remote -v

tome